Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-07-22 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is just a bit better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, having a score of 78.1 against 72.6. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version, counting with a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's design is newer and somewhat thinner than the LG G3 Cat. 6's, but it is also just a little bit heavier.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge. Both have a screen of the same size, the same pixels density and exactly the same 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a slightly better storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 200 GB.
LG G3 Cat. 6 features a little faster processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the LG G3 Cat. 6 also counts with an extra graphics processor. Galaxy S7 edge features a greater camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has longer battery life than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is more expensive than LG G3 Cat. 6, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.