Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than LG G3 Cat. 6, having a global score of 94.6 against 72.6. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than LG G3 Cat. 6, it's notably thinner and extremely newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and 9 GB more RAM. The LG G3 Cat. 6 counts with a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot better camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a back camera with less megapixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage for applications and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior battery life than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G3 Cat. 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G3 Cat. 6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG G3 Cat. 6, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.