Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 74.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-05-27 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White | Blue, Pink and Titanium |
| $ 189.00 | $ 190.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G3 has a score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than LG K51S's 74.3 overall score. Even though the LG G3 is much older and a bit thicker than the LG K51S, it's construction is still noticeably lighter. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the LG G3 has the older 5.0 version and LG K51S has Android 10.
The LG G3 features just a little better hardware performance than LG K51S, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the LG G3 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The LG G3 features a way better display than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixels count per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The LG G3 captures clearer photos and videos than LG K51S, because although it has a lot less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a way better video quality. The LG K51S counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than LG G3, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
The LG K51S has improved battery life than LG G3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG G3 is also cheaper than the LG K51S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.