Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-07-08 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.62 x 2.86 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 380 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 100 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a lot better than the LG G4 Beat's 66 score. Even though the LG G8X ThinQ is much heavier than the LG G4 Beat, it's thinner and newer. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version while LG G4 Beat has Android 5.1, providing a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
LG G4 Beat counts with a sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. LG G8X ThinQ features a very superior performance than LG G4 Beat, because it has 7 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG G8X ThinQ shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LG G4 Beat, because it has a camera with lot more MP, a way bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher video quality. LG G8X ThinQ has a very superior memory to install applications and games than LG G4 Beat, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a way better battery duration than LG G4 Beat, because it has a 74% larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also cheap compared to the LG G4 Beat.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.