Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-07-08 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.62 x 2.86 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 230.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 380 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 100 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Fast has a general score of 72.2, which is slightly better than LG G4 Beat's general score of 66. The Motorola Moto G Fast is a extremely newer and a little thinner phone than LG G4 Beat, but it's also notably heavier. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G Fast has 11 version and LG G4 Beat has Android 5.1 version, providing you some extra features.
The Moto G Fast features a better processing power than LG G4 Beat, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. LG G4 Beat has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much better display pixel density.
Motorola Moto G Fast captures much clearer photos and videos than LG G4 Beat, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and video, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher video definition. The Moto G Fast has much more storage for games and applications than LG G4 Beat, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a really longer battery duration than LG G4 Beat, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2300mAh.
The Moto G Fast not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.