Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than the LG G5's general score of 76.1. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is incredibly newer, but just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the LG G5. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG G5 counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than LG G5, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG G5 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better camera than LG G5, because although it has a lower video definition and a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low-light environments.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a superior battery duration than LG G5, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a little more than LG G5, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.