Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-31 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than LG G5, with a overall score of 81.3 against 76.1. LG V35 ThinQ's design has the same thickness than LG G5, but it is just a bit lighter. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than LG G5, because although it has a little worse pixels amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G5, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than LG G5, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has greater battery performance than LG G5, because it has an 18 percent more battery size. LG V35 ThinQ features a camera that's very similar to LG G5's camera, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a tinier sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.