Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than LG G5's 76.1 general score. LG V40 ThinQ's design is way newer than the LG G5's, although it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than LG G5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V40 ThinQ has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G5, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more internal memory.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit faster processor than LG G5, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG G5, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have the same camera sensor size, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture.
The LG V40 ThinQ features better battery performance than LG G5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V40 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.