Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is much better than the LG G5's 76.1 score. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola razr (2020) is a extremely newer cellphone than the LG G5, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster processing unit than LG G5, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The LG G5 has a much better display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a slightly better storage to install games and applications than LG G5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light environments, a back camera with a way better resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola razr (2020)'s battery duration is just as good as LG G5's battery lifetime.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G5. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG G5, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.