Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 554 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the LG G5, getting a score of 79.2 against 76.1. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but way heavier than the LG G5. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG G5 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. LG G5 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior camera than LG G5, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a camera with much more megapixels and a much higher video quality.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery life than LG G5, because it has a 68% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.