Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is way better than the LG G5's 76.1 general score. Galaxy A52 5G's design is noticeably newer than LG G5's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better processing unit than LG G5, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of 2.2 GHz cores. LG G5 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG G5, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52 5G captures much better pictures and videos than LG G5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery life than LG G5, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.