Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-31 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than LG G5's overall score of 76.1. Galaxy A70's design is notably newer than the LG G5's, although it's just a little thicker and heavier. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A70 has 10 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG G5 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A70 features a bit faster processor than LG G5, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG G5 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG G5 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Galaxy A70 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G5, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A70 features a really longer battery life than LG G5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A70 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.