Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 554 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than LG G5, having a global score of 88.1 against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a way newer phone than the LG G5, but it is notably thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG G5 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G5, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better performance than LG G5, and although they both have 4 cores, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has more RAM. The Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG G5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery performance than LG G5, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.