Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-31 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the LG G5, having a score of 93.6 against 76.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S10 5G's construction is way newer, but heavier and just a little bit thicker than LG G5.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than LG G5, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. Galaxy S10 5G has a display that's just as good as LG G5's screen, because although the Galaxy S10 5G has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better camera than LG G5, because although it has a much lower resolution back camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy S10 5G has slightly more storage to store more games and applications than LG G5, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10 5G features a much longer battery performance than LG G5, because it has a 61% more battery size.
The Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.