Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than LG G5, with a 98 score against 76.1. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is extremely newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than the LG G5.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in LG G5, because although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a much larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G5, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG G5, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than LG G5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger sensor and a lot more mega pixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than LG G5, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.