Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 82.5 score against 77. Google Pixel 2 XL is a somewhat heavier device than LG G7 Fit, but both are equally thin. LG G7 Fit features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit better screen pixels density and a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG G7 Fit counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has improved battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3520mAh battery capacity. LG G7 Fit and Google Pixel 2 XL feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lot lower 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality photos and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.