Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 score. Although the Google Pixel 3a and the LG G7 Fit were released only 6 months apart, the Google Pixel 3a construction is just a little bit lighter but also just a bit thicker than the LG G7 Fit. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Google Pixel 3a has a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3a also has 4 more CPU cores. LG G7 Fit has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater screen density.
Google Pixel 3a features a camera that is very similar to LG G7 Fit's camera, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a much less mega pixels back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a and LG G7 Fit both feature extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.