Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a score of 78.9 against 77. Even being the best we compare here, Google Pixel 3a XL is a just a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than LG G7 Fit. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a larger number of cores. LG G7 Fit features a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
LG G7 Fit and Google Pixel 3a XL count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures and a larger sensor capturing better quality photos.
The LG G7 Fit has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3a XL features longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.