Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 82.9 score against 77. Google Pixel 4a's construction is newer and just a bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than the LG G7 Fit. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater display density. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel 4a's camera is just as good as the LG G7 Fit one, because although the Google Pixel 4a has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a much worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way bigger aperture. The LG G7 Fit has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.