Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than LG G7 Fit, with an 87.5 score against 77. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it is a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
LG G7 Fit has a much better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better pixel density. LG G7 Fit features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with greater battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a way worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and a way larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.