Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the LG K52's score of 76. The LG G7 Fit body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than LG K52, although it was released many years before. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but LG G7 Fit has a newer 8.1 Oreo version and LG K52 has Android 10.
LG K52 has just a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG K52 also has more processing cores. LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG K52 takes a bit better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG K52 also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video, a way larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
LG K52 has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K52 also has more internal storage capacity. LG K52 counts with improved battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.