Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Sky Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K62 has a global score of 78.2, which is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the LG K62 has the older 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Although LG K62 is newer than LG G7 Fit, it is a little bit thicker and heavier.
The LG K62 features a bit more powerful processor than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG K62 also has a higher number of cores. The LG G7 Fit has a lot better looking screen than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a way greater pixels quantity per screen inch.
LG K62 shoots a bit better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the LG K62 also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG K62 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG K62 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG K62 has superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.