Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than LG G7 Fit, getting a overall score of 85.4 against 77. The LG K92 body is newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the LG G7 Fit. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG K92 has older 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. LG K92 has a little faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores (although slower).
The LG G7 Fit features a lot better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG K92 has a lot better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos, a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations.
LG K92 features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal memory capacity. LG K92 features longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.