Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than LG G7 Fit, with an 82.5 score against 77. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has the older 8.0 Oreo version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. LG V30S ThinQ's design is a little thinner but just a little heavier than the LG G7 Fit, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with a more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a little higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a bit better display pixel density and a little bit bigger display.
LG V30S ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 16 MP resolution camera in the back, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a lot larger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more internal storage. LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.