Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. LG V35 ThinQ's design is a bit thinner but just a little heavier than LG G7 Fit, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores.
LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch, a quite better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a quite bigger display. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.