Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. These phones include Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Although LG V60 ThinQ is newer than LG G7 Fit, it's much heavier and thicker. The LG G7 Fit has a brighter display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% more battery size. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a way bigger sensor, a larger aperture, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.