Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than LG G7 Fit, with an 87.1 score against 77. The LG Velvet is a heavier cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The LG G7 Fit features a brighter screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG Velvet has a bit faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG Velvet features a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor.
LG Velvet features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal memory. LG Velvet features a really longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.