Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Glacier |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a 78.8 score against 77. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Microsoft Surface Duo has older 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Microsoft Surface Duo's body is newer and incredibly thinner than LG G7 Fit's, although it's also way heavier.
Microsoft Surface Duo features a bit superior processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3120px, it also counts with a higher pixel density.
LG G7 Fit has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Microsoft Surface Duo has greater battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3577mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG G7 Fit shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.