Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than LG G7 Fit, having a 92.8 score against 77. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, but they have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an older 12 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
LG G7 Fit has a better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little bit more storage to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.