Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit, with a 77.2 score against 77. Even though Motorola Edge 40 is just a bit heavier than LG G7 Fit, it's a little bit thinner and newer. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 has the previous 13 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG G7 Fit has a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little darker display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a better pixels density. LG G7 Fit features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a lot larger diafragm aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The LG G7 Fit has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.