Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, having an 83.4 score against 77. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a way newer phone than the LG G7 Fit, but it is just a bit thicker and way heavier. These devices include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an older 13 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM. LG G7 Fit features a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and less brightness, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better memory to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, because it has a much more MP camera in the back, a bigger aperture for better captures in low light situations, a much larger camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.