Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is way newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the previous 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster). The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1256 x 2760 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display and much more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 44% bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bigger aperture for better low light photography, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.