Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is noticeably newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
LG G7 Fit counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has much worse brightness and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG G7 Fit features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs, a much bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and a back camera with way more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.