Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 87.1 score against 77. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone than LG G7 Fit, although it's just a bit thicker and a lot heavier.
The LG G7 Fit features a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser processing cores. LG G7 Fit features a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen and much less brightness, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixel density.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with a way higher resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality and a much larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.