Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Smoke black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, having a 77 score against 76.1. The LG G7 Fit construction is much lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power, although it was released a little bit over a year before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11.
Motorola Moto G Power features a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower). The LG G7 Fit features a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better screen pixels density.
Moto G Power features a slightly better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with a 16 mega pixels resolution, the Moto G Power also has a larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations.
The LG G7 Fit features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto G Power counts with a really longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.