Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is better than LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. The Moto G200 5G is a way newer cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, although it is thicker and heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Moto G200 5G has just a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. LG G7 Fit features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The Moto G200 5G captures greater videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also has a way higher resolution camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography. The LG G7 Fit counts with much more storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto G200 5G features a way better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.