Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is a bit better than Moto G9 Play, with a 77 score against 76.7. LG G7 Fit's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than Moto G9 Play, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG G7 Fit has a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G9 Play has a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has more processing cores. Moto G9 Play features a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Play also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a much larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a way larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play features a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.