Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-11-09 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, with a 77 score against 75.8. Even though LG G7 Fit is a little bit thicker than the Moto Z Force, it's a bit lighter and notably newer. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat, so it gives you a lot of extra features.
The LG G7 Fit features a better screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger display and a little bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. Moto Z Force counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto Z Force features a slightly better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also has a camera with way more megapixels and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has more internal memory capacity. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.