Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting a general score of 78.5 against 77. The Motorola One Action construction is newer, but heavier and thicker than the LG G7 Fit. The Motorola One Action has a bit faster CPU than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Action also has a greater number of cores.
LG G7 Fit has a brighter screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG G7 Fit captures clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The Motorola One Action features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Motorola One Action has a bit better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.