Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has the older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Even though Motorola One Hyper is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker.
Motorola One Hyper features a little faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores (although they are slower). LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Motorola One Hyper has a much better storage for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a lot more megapixels camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Motorola One Hyper has better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.