Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 563 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A20s has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. Galaxy A20s is a somewhat heavier cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A20s has older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy A20s and LG G7 Fit count with quite similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A20s has more CPU cores (although they are slower), they both have a 4 GB RAM. LG G7 Fit has a way better display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a lot greater display pixel density.
The LG G7 Fit takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in low light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with more MP, a lot higher video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The LG G7 Fit features a slightly better storage for apps and games than Galaxy A20s, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A20s has longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.