Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A21, with a global score of 77 against 76.1. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10. LG G7 Fit's body is lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A21, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more more than a year before.
The Samsung Galaxy A21 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. LG G7 Fit counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG G7 Fit has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG G7 Fit shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality videos and images and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have a camera in the back with a 16 mega-pixels resolution, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.