Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 563 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A21s is a bit better than LG G7 Fit, having a 77.7 score against 77. These devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A21s has older 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy A21s construction is newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s features a bit faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. LG G7 Fit features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher display pixel density.
LG G7 Fit has a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A21s has a better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A21s also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s has a much better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.