Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is slightly better than Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. LG G7 Fit's construction is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A22, even though it was released many years before. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 Fit has a newer 8.1 Oreo version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a higher number of cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
Galaxy A22 features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. LG G7 Fit takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution.
LG G7 Fit has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.