Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's construction is a lot newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it is thicker and notably heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the previous 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy A22 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of cores. LG G7 Fit features a better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a much more megapixels back camera and a bigger aperture to take better captures in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.