Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a bit better than LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. The Galaxy A25 5G construction is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker than the LG G7 Fit. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser cpu cores and 2 GB lesser RAM. The LG G7 Fit features a better display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same display brightness, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger aperture and a larger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much better storage for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.