Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30 is a bit better than LG G7 Fit, with a global score of 79.6 against 77. Although the Samsung Galaxy A30 and the LG G7 Fit were released with only 4 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A30 body is a little heavier but also just a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A30's processor is very similar to LG G7 Fit's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A30 has 4 more processing cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM.
The LG G7 Fit features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. LG G7 Fit has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images and a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have a back facing camera with a 16 MP, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
LG G7 Fit has a little bit better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A30 features superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.