Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 77. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy A31 body is newer than the LG G7 Fit's, although it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG G7 Fit features a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has more processing cores (although slower). Samsung Galaxy A31 features a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.