Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is a bit better than LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A35 5G has an older 14 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Although Galaxy A35 5G is a lot newer than LG G7 Fit, it's just a bit thicker and way heavier.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and way more brightness. LG G7 Fit counts with a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The LG G7 Fit features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.