Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit, having an 83.8 score against 77. Even though the Galaxy A50 and the LG G7 Fit were released with only 4 months difference, the Galaxy A50 design is a bit thinner but also a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a higher number of cores.
LG G7 Fit features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with more memory to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A50 features improved battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes a bit better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with a lot better 25 megapixels resolution, a lot larger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.